The Supreme Court will allow Donald Trump to continue summarily deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members under a centuries-old wartime law after the administration deported dozens of immigrants to a notorious El Salvador prison.
A divided court on Monday night agreed to lift a judge’s order that temporarily blocked the president’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to swiftly deport people from the country, but the justices said they are “entitled to notice and an opportunity to challenge their removal.”
“The only question is which court will resolve that challenge,” they wrote.
Those challenges must take place in Texas, not in Washington, D.C., according to the unsigned order.
Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the court’s liberal justices Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor in dissent.
The 5-4 decision — with the court’s women dissenting — follows a federal appeals court’s rejection of the president’s attempt to throw out a ruling from District Judge James Boasberg, who is also weighing whether to hold government officials in contempt for allegedly defying his court orders return deportation flights to the United States before dozens of Venezuelan immigrants landed in a Salvadoran prison facing the prospect of indefinite detention.
Flights were in the air on March 15 when Boasberg ordered the administration to turn the planes around after a lawsuit from the ACLU challenging their clients’ removal. The judge wants to know when government lawyers relayed his verbal and written orders to administration officials and who, if anyone, gave the flights a greenlight despite the orders.
In his proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act for the fourth time in U.S. history, Trump states that “all Venezuelan citizens 14 years of age or older who are members of [Tren de Aragua], are within the United States, and are not actually naturalized or lawful permanent residents of the United States are liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed as Alien Enemies.”
But the administration has since admitted in court filings that “many” of the people sent to El Salvador did not have criminal records, and attorneys and family members say their clients and relatives — some of whom were in the country with legal permission and have upcoming court hearings on their asylum claims — have nothing to do with Tren de Aragua.
This is a developing story
