Global economy will ‘massively suffer’ from Donald Trump tariffs, Ursula von der Leyen warns – Europe live


Morning opening: A broken stick

Jakub Krupa

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen warned this morning that the global economy “will massively suffer” as a result of tariffs imposed by US president Donald Trump last night, as she said the EU was “prepared to respond.”

Despite Trump’s direct attack on “pathetic” EU as he imposed 20% tariffs on the bloc, von der Leyen still expressed hopes that the relationship could “move from confrontation to negotiation,” as she warned “there seems to be no order in disorder.”

But it wasn’t immediately obvious that there was any genuine prospect of that happening.

Instead the EU and the individual member states are now scrambling to consider how to manage the situation.

French president Emmanuel Macron has called an emergency meeting with sectors affected by Trump’s tariffs this afternoon.

German economic daily Handelsblatt published new estimates this morning that the US tariffs – including 25% on car imports – could cost German carmakers BMW, Mercedes and Volkswagen as much as €11 bn given Germany is the largest EU car exporter to the US. For perspective, it’s just under a third of the total value of German automotive exports to the US at €36.8 bn.

But the worry is not only about the immediate impact, but the more long term consequences of last night’s decision.

Addressing Europeans directly, von der Leyen said “I know that many of you feel let down by our oldest ally,” as she stressed the need to think about what’s next.

Or as Moritz Schularick, president of the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, put it to Handelsblatt:

“There is this memorable picture of a stick that you can bend and that comes back again and again. But at some point, if you bend too much, the stick breaks.

I believe that in terms of trust in the United States, something has broken down in recent weeks that will not come back so quickly.”

A map showing countries exporting most goods to the US

It’s Thursday, 3 April 2025, it’s Jakub Krupa here, and this is Europe Live.

Good morning. Fasten your seatbelts, it’s going to be a lively one.

Key events

EU to respond in ‘proportionate and decisive way,’ but use of anti-coercion rules only ‘last resort,’ leading lawmaker says

Jennifer Rankin

Jennifer Rankin

The EU will respond in a “legitimate, proportionate and decisive way” to Donald Trump’s trade tariffs, but its strongest weapon is still “a last resort”, the head of the European parliament’s international trade committee has said.

Bernd Lange, a German Social Democrat, said the EU was discussing the use of the anti-coercion instrument, which EU insiders almost inevitably describe as “the big bazooka”.

The anti-coercion legislation, which entered into force in 2023, gives the EU wide leeway to impose commerce and investment sanctions against a foreign government deemed to be using trade in an attempt to browbeat countries into changing unrelated policies.

It was agreed not long after China had imposed trade restrictions on Lithuania over the Baltic state’s friendly policy towards Taiwan.

Lange, who helped negotiate the law, said the EU was discussing use of this instrument – “this is of course the bazooka, the strongest measure we could take” – but it would only be used as a last resort.

“This is not our first step. Using the ACI, this would really be hard escalation and therefore a last resort, but we have it.”

Having renamed Trump’s so-called “liberation day”, as “inflation day”, the MEP said that the EU could target US tech giants in retaliation for tariffs, which is possible even without the anti-coercion law. “Of course if we are really on an escalation ladder, then of course we will have a look to the tech giants as well – I would say this is not the first choice.”

The MEP, who travels to Washington next week, still hopes the EU can negotiate its way out of tariffs, but is not optimistic. He described the structure of the US government as “totally unclear” and that only the president and his trade adviser, Peter Navarro, controlled trade, rather than senior officials, such as the US Trade Representative, adding: “That is really a mess.”



Source link

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected

0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Latest Articles