Australia election 2025 live: Bowen says Coalition modelling on gas bill savings is a ‘scamphlet’ missing important detail


Climate change and energy minister labels Coalition’s gas policy analysis a ‘scamphlet’

Adam Morton

The climate change and energy minister, Chris Bowen, has criticised Frontier Economics analysis that claims the Coalition’s policy could lower gas prices, describing it as a “scamphlet”.

Giving a media conference at a Smart Energy Council conference in Sydney, Bowen brandished the 15-page report, which he said was “alleged modelling” and included only 135 words on the impact on electricity prices.

I’ve seen longer menus in a restaurant than this …[Coalition frontbencher] James Patterson told the Australian people they’ve been working on this for a year, which works out at a very low productivity rate per word.

If this is a year’s work, this is a nonsense document filled with holes.

Frontier estimated the Coalition’s policy could reduce domestic gas prices by 7% and electricity bills by 3%. The report does not include the modelling that was used to reach these figures.

Bowen said modelling of the Coalition’s nuclear proposal released in December suggested a big fall in gas usage in the energy grid, but four months later it was saying “we need more gas”.

He said Coalition frontbenchers had made contradictory claims about the impact on prices today and had “a lot of clearing up to do”.

He said:

They’ve retrofitted this document, which was clearly prepared after the budget reply.

Bowen said he was looking forward to debating the shadow minister for climate change and energy minister, Ted O’Brien, tomorrow.

Climate change and energy minister, Chris Bowen.
Climate change and energy minister, Chris Bowen. Photograph: Joel Carrett/AAP
Share

Updated at 

Key events

Lisa Cox

Lisa Cox

NSW Forestry Corporation high court appeal dismissed

The Forestry Corporation of NSW has lost an appeal in the high court that may open the door for community groups to challenge alleged environmental breaches by the state-owned logging company and bring public interest cases involving logging of threatened species habitat in NSW to the courts.

The court dismissed forestry corporation’s argument that a section of the state’s forestry act prevented groups or individuals that met the common law test for standing from commencing legal proceedings to enforce compliance with logging laws and protect threatened wildlife.

The South East Forest Alliance described it as a “landmark judgment”.

The alliance brought the initial proceedings in the NSW land and environment court in 2024 alleging the forestry agency had failed to comply with conditions meant to protect species such as the greater glider during native forest logging operations.

A greater glider possum

Spokesperson Scott Daines said:

This judgment confirms that organisations with a deep and ongoing commitment to environmental protection can hold government-owned entities accountable to the law.

Forestry Corporation tried to shut down this case before it even began. That strategy has failed.

The NSW Greens environment spokesperson, and former environmental lawyer Sue Higginson said the decision marked the end of “a dark era” and “the end of the rule that only the Environment Protection Authority can prosecute the Forestry Corporation” for alleged environmental breaches.

She said:

The high court has now rightly opened the door for public interest cases to be brought against the continued logging in our native forests.

Guardian Australia has sought comment from the NSW Forestry Corporation.

Share

Updated at 



Source link

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected

0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Latest Articles