Before Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to the White House, United States President Donald Trump said Palestinians have “no alternative” but to leave Gaza. When the two leaders met in the Oval Office, Trump declared that after Palestinians from the Gaza Strip are moved elsewhere, the US will “take over”. The president also expressed his desire to transform the Israeli-occupied territory into the “Riviera of the Middle East”.
These surrealistic statements were uttered on Tuesday as Palestinians across the Gaza Strip are facing unprecedented destruction left behind by the Israeli army. Many of those who have been displaced and have managed to go back to their homes in the past two weeks have found only ruins. According to the United Nations, the Israeli army has bombed 90 percent of all housing units in the Gaza Strip, leaving 160,000 units destroyed and 276,000 severely or partially damaged.
As the dust settles and images of the extent of the devastation circulate on mainstream media, it has become clear that the genocidal violence Israel unleashed in Gaza was not only used to kill, displace and destroy but also to undercut the Palestinian population’s right to remain. And it is precisely the possibility of securing this right that the Trump-Netanyahu duo is now bent on preventing.
Remaining as a right
The right to remain is not formally recognised within the human rights canon and is usually associated with refugees who have fled their country and are permitted to stay in a host country while seeking asylum. It has also been invoked in the context of so-called urban renewal projects in which largely marginalised and insecurely housed urban residents demand their right to stay in their homes and among their community when faced with pressure from powerful actors pushing for redevelopment and gentrification. The right to remain is particularly urgent in settler-colonial situations where colonisers actively displace the Indigenous population and try to replace them with settlers. From First Nations in North America to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia, settlers have used genocidal violence to deny Indigenous people this right.
The right to remain, however, is not merely the right to “stay put”. Rather, to enjoy this right, people must be able to remain within their community and have access to both material and social “infrastructures of existence”, including water and food, hospitals, schools, places of worship and the means to a livelihood. Without these infrastructures, the right to remain becomes impossible.
Beyond mere physical presence, the right to remain also encompasses the right to maintain the historical and contemporary stories and webs of relations that hold people and communities together in place and time. This is a crucial aspect of this right because the settler-colonial project not only aims for the physical removal and replacement of Indigenous people but also seeks to erase Indigenous cultures, histories and identities as well as any attachments to land. Finally, it cannot be enough to be allowed to remain as an occupied inhabitant within a besieged territory. The right to remain includes the ability of a people to determine their own destiny.
A history of permanent displacement
During the 1948 war, Palestinian cities were depopulated and about 500 Palestinian villages were destroyed as most of their inhabitants became refugees in neighbouring countries. In total, about 750,000 Palestinians out of a population of 900,000 were displaced from their homes and ancestral lands and were never allowed to return. Since then, displacement or the threat of displacement has been part of the everyday Palestinian experience. Indeed, throughout the occupied West Bank and even within Israel in places like Umm al Hiran, Palestinian communities continue to be forcibly uprooted and removed from their lands and prevented from returning.
The US-backed Israeli denial of the right to remain in the Gaza Strip is far worse – not only because many communities are made up of refugees and this is their second, third or fourth displacement – but also because displacement has now become a tool of genocide. As early as October 13, 2023, Israel issued a collective evacuation order to 1.1 million Palestinians living north of Wadi Gaza, and in the following months, similar orders were issued time and again, ultimately displacing 90 percent of the Strip’s population.
To be sure, international humanitarian law obligates warring parties to protect civilian populations, which includes allowing them to move from warzones to safe areas. Yet these provisions are informed by the assumption that populations have a right to remain in their homes and, therefore, stipulate that evacuees must be allowed to return when the fighting ends, rendering any form of permanent displacement illegal. Population transfer must be temporary and can only be used for protection and humanitarian relief and not, as Israel has used and Trump’s recent comments reinforce, a “humanitarian camouflage” to cover up the wholesale destruction and undoing of Palestinian spaces.
The right to remain and self-determination
Now that a ceasefire has been declared, displaced Palestinians are able to go back to where they used to live. Yet this movement back in no way satisfies their right to remain. This is no coincidence: The ability to remain is precisely what Israel has been aiming to eradicate in 15 months of war.
The razing of hospitals, schools, universities, mosques, shops and street markets, cemeteries and libraries alongside the destruction of roads, wells, electricity grids, greenhouses and fishing vessels was not only carried out in the service of mass killings and the temporary cleansing of areas of their inhabitants but also to create a new reality on the ground, particularly in northern Gaza. Thus it is not just that Palestinian homes have been destroyed but that the very existence of the population will also now be compromised for years to come.
This is not a new thing. We have seen throughout history how settlers act to permanently displace and eliminate Indigenous populations from their territories. Learning from these stories we know that financial investment in rebuilding houses and infrastructure will not – in itself – ensure the population’s right to remain. Remaining requires self-determination. To enact their right to remain, Palestinians must finally gain their freedom as a self-determining people.
Israel has denied Palestinians their right to remain for more than 75 years. It is high time to set things straight. Any discussion about the future of Gaza must be guided by the claims and aspirations of the Palestinian people. Promises of reconstruction and economic prosperity by foreign countries are irrelevant unless explicitly tied to Palestinian self-determination. The right to remain can be guaranteed only through decolonisation and Palestinian liberation.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.
