Star Trek’s Alex Kurtzman Explains Why Section 31’s Story Didn’t Violate Gene Roddenberry’s Vision, And Fans Might’ve Missed This



With Star Trek: Section 31 available to stream with a Paramount+ subscription, one of the franchise’s most controversial additions has again reared its head. There have been conversations about whether Section 31 was an affront to Gene Roddenberry’s vision for Starfleet since Deep Space Nine and EP Alex Kurtzman and director Olutande Osunsanmi assured CinemaBlend they did their best to ensure they didn’t help the argument it doesn’t have a place.

While critics haven’t been kind in their reviews of Star Trek: Section 31, there’s been far more criticism of other parts of the movie rather than how the shadow ops sector of Starfleet was portrayed. Kurtzman explained to me why the team stayed away from doing a darker storyline like some might’ve expected, and how he felt Section 31 is justified within the utopian ideals of the universe:

Obviously, there’s a lot of conversation among fans about Section 31 and what it means in the Trek universe and is it a violation of Roddenberry’s vision or not. Part of our choice about the tone had to do with exactly that question. Because I think if we had done a dark, dark, dark Star Trek story that was just purely dark, people would have felt like that doesn’t really feel like Star Trek. And yet the thing that we kept anchoring back to that was so important to us is this idea that Starfleet acts by a certain charter. It operates within Federation space. It operates according to very specific rules, and those rules really cannot be broken. There are certain problems that cannot be solved by those rules, and that’s what Section 31 is for. Section 31 exists so that Starfleet can keep its nose clean.



Source link

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected

0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Latest Articles